Learn how to set up a 19-advisor AI boardroom that pressure-tests your teaching artifacts and tells you exactly what to fix. Brutally specific. $67, lifetime access.
One purchase. Keep it forever. No subscription.
Globally recognized teaching-with-AI expert; Endowed Chair in Entrepreneurship, Founding Director of the Donnelly School of Leadership & Social Innovation, Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship at John Carroll University; Cofounder, Experiential Entrepreneurship Curriculum
The lesson you've taught three times. You know something is off. Students glaze over at minute 22. The activity that was supposed to spark a debate produces silence. The rubric that was supposed to clarify expectations produces a flood of emails asking what you actually want.
You know it's broken. You don't know exactly why.
So who reviews it? A colleague, if you can talk one into it. They'll say it looks great. They're being polite. The dean isn't reading your lesson plans. Students aren't going to tell you. And you don't have time to read three books on cognitive load between now and Tuesday.
So the plan stays. You teach it again. You blame the students.
That's most of us, most semesters. The teacher boardroom is the fix.
You hand it your lesson plan, rubric, slide deck, syllabus, or any teaching artifact. Plus a one-sentence learning objective. The board reads it, argues for as many rounds as it takes to reach consensus, and converges on a specific list of changes that will make the artifact actually work.
Any format. Any subject. The board doesn't need it polished. It needs it real.
No groupthink. They haven't seen each other's positions yet.
Piaget rips the lecture-heavy section. The naysayer rips Piaget for being impractical. bell hooks rips both of them. The fight is the value.
Not "improve engagement." Surgical changes. "Replace slide 3's definitional question with a 90-second debate around the actual case."
You get a STRONG, MIXED, or REWORK call. Plus a rewritten version of your artifact. Plus a changelog explaining every edit so you internalize the lesson, not just the fix.
I run the boardroom live on a member-submitted artifact. Watch it happen. Steal the moves. Buy now to attend live. Get all recordings and documents if you can't attend live.
One $67 payment. Lifetime access. No subscription, no upsell, no waiting list.
The full 19-advisor skill, ready to run on any teaching artifact you've got. Lesson plans, rubrics, slide decks, assignment prompts, syllabi, group project briefs. Drop it in. Walk away. Come back to a complete report.
10+ pre-written advisor personas you can swap in or stack on top of the core 19. Your dean. The colleague whose feedback you've been avoiding. A skeptical-student archetype. Famous adversaries. Build the room you wish you had access to.
Three of my own boardroom runs on real teaching artifacts I use at John Carroll. Annotated. With notes on what I kept, what I rejected, and why. Steal the meta-skill, not just the steps.
One short email a day for five days, walking you through your first run, picking the right artifact, and acting on the report without blowing up your course. Designed for the "I bought it but haven't opened it yet" version of you.
10+ pre-configured boardroom prompts ready to copy and paste. One for syllabi. One for AI policy statements. One for exam questions. One for group project briefs. One for activity hot-seats. Skip the prompt engineering, get straight to the report.
I've taught my capstone seminar for nine years. The boardroom flagged that my opening exercise was rewarding the loudest student instead of the sharpest one. I'd never seen it. My next class was the most engaged discussion I've run all year.
I ran my final project rubric through the boardroom expecting polite feedback. Instead, 19 advisors argued that my rubric was rewarding compliance over thinking. They were right. My students' projects this semester were the best I've ever graded.
I rewrote my AI policy three times and it still felt like theater. The boardroom told me why. I was banning behaviors I couldn't detect, which trained students to hide their AI use instead of own it. I rebuilt the policy around what I could see in their work. Students started citing their AI use openly within a week.
You bookmark this page. You close the tab. Next semester you teach the same lesson plan. Students respond the same way. You blame the students, the platform, the calendar. Repeat.
You spend $67. You read 19 critiques. You change three things. The semester after is 30 percent better. Two years from now you teach like someone whose work has been pressure-tested for 200 hours, because it has.
The lazy version is embarrassing now that you've seen the alternative.
Get the boardroom — $67Lifetime access. No subscription. Buy once, use forever.